Yeah. Those are the reasons why YOUR argument fails.Your argument fails for many reasons.
Yeah, still wrong. Doubling donw on a stupid claim won't make it any less stupid. Nazis were a right wing party. Period.As outlined above
Yeah. Those are the reasons why YOUR argument fails.Your argument fails for many reasons.
Yeah, still wrong. Doubling donw on a stupid claim won't make it any less stupid. Nazis were a right wing party. Period.As outlined above
Sure whatever, the Law was invoked. Go ahead and show where TSLA shareholders support this diversion of H100s from their company to another private company they have no interest in.
Yeah I'm a Tesla shareholder, I have been for years and I own hundreds of shares. I fully support the decision. You also completely mispresent the situation, making it sound like Tesla is just giving away money or assets. They essentially deferred the delivery of their product. Like Elon said, they would've sat in a warehouse for several months if they accepted delivery. Therefore it didn't affect Tesla's business, whether financials or operations, at all.Let's follow your own logic and your own post. You posted:
You made the claim of shareholder support. Therefore the onus is on you to provide proof. Those words might seem familiar.
And your BS assumption of 'sides' betrays preconceived notions here. I realize you are answering multiple people at once but stick to the topic instead of labeling people.
The proof is that shareholders have overwhelmingly voted him into the CEO office year after year after year, despite numerous of these propaganda hit pieces claiming "Musk is hurting the company and shareholders are outraged."You made the claim of shareholder support. Therefore the onus is on you to provide proof.
Well to be fair, the CEO is not a position that is voted in. Elon Musk did used to be voted in as chairman, but that option was taken away from the actual shareholders by a settlement with the SEC. He was always elected for that position though. Anyways, if we didn't want him around, we could always divest or vote other board members in that would try to keep the reins on him. Personally, I'm happy with his performance.The proof is that shareholders have overwhelmingly voted him into the CEO office year after year after year, despite numerous of these propaganda hit pieces claiming "Musk is hurting the company and shareholders are outraged."
Tell you what. Tesla's next shareholder meeting is one week away. I'll bet you any sum you choose to wager that Musk will again be chosen by shareholders to retain his spot -- and overwhelmingly so. Techspot can hold the stakes. Deal?