"Un-contract" customers enraged as T-Mobile unlocks its price-lock with new rate hikes

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,222   +1,441
Staff member
In context: Consumers getting burned by surprise clauses in the fineprint of the legal agreements they enter into has almost become a cliché in the Internet Age. Very few prople thoroughly read terms of service documents. The instant gratification of hitting that "agree" button outweighs the burden of reading a contract that rivels a novel in word count.

Less than two weeks ago, T-Mobile announced across-the-board price hikes. The Mobile Report noted that most customers would see monthly increases of $2 to $5 per line. The new rates reportedly did not apply to "price-locked" plans. However, there is some confusion regarding how T-Mobile defines price-locked.

Did anyone else get the following letter from T-Mobile because they filed an FCC complaint?
byu/mjsztainbok intmobile

Some long-time T-Mobile One customers have found that their supposedly price-locked plans are getting hit by the rate hike. One Redditor who filed a complaint with the FCC regarding the increase received a letter from the Un-carrier explaining that the terms of his contract stipulate that if T-Mobile raised his rates, he was entitled to the company covering his last month's bill providing he canceled service within 60 days of the increase. However, this is far from what T-Mobile led him and other One customers to believe.

As part of former CEO John Legere's 2017 Un-carrier campaign, T-Mobile promised to lock prices for those on the T-Mobile One contract. The press release's wording was unambiguous and explicitly states that rates would only increase if the customer switched plans.

New Rule: Only YOU Should Have the Power to Change What You Pay – Introducing Un-contract for T-Mobile One

Today, T-Mobile introduced the Un-contract for T-Mobile One – and notched another industry first with the first-ever price guarantee on an unlimited 4G LTE plan. With the Un-contract, T-Mobile signs, and customers hold all the power. Now, T-Mobile One customers keep their price until THEY decide to change it. T-Mobile will never [emphasis mine] change the price you pay for your T-Mobile One plan. When you sign up for T-Mobile One, only YOU have the power to change the price you pay.

There isn't even fine print in the release stating the conditions that T-Mobile mentions in its letter. However, using the Wayback Machine reveals a long-deleted T-Mobile One FAQ describing the caveat.

Furthermore, customers on Simple Choice plans dating back to 2015 were also made the same guarntee, but no evidence regarding the loophole exists going back that far. The only accounts that appear unaffected by the rate hikes are those from the most recent "Price Lock" promotion, which started in 2022 and was discontinued in 2024.

From T-Mobile's FCC complaint response:

As for customers with concerns about T-Mobile's Price Lock guarantee, it is important to note that customers with Price Lock are not impacted by the change. On April 28, 2022, T-Mobile began offering Price Lock on new account activations on qualifying rate plans. For customers who activated on a qualifying plan between April 28, 2022 and January 17, 2024, Price Lock guarantees that accounts activated with a qualifying rate plan, within the enrollment period, would not be subject to a price increase, so long as the account remained in good standing and the customer remained on the qualifying rate plan.

T-Mobile's letter distinguishes between the terms "Un-contract" – the verbiage used in the 2015 and 2017 promotions – and "Price Lock," used in the 2022 marketing campaign. The company claims that the loophole existed in the older versions but not the latest.

Furthermore, a customer on the T-Mobile forum points out that the terms and conditions of their One plan have no language regarding T-Mobile waiving the final bill on cancellation if it raises rates. The suggested loophole only exists in a FAQ that is no longer available without digging through archived webpages – not very transparent.

Related Reading: FCC slaps top telecom companies with $200 million in fines for selling user location data

The fiasco has "bait-and-switch" written all over it, but the problem is not unique to T-Mobile. Many companies are prone to lying by omission in their marketing materials while burying loopholes in the tens of thousands of words of legal fine print. That said, regulators have recently been coming down on deceptive marketing practices.

In March, the FCC finally banned the "hidden fee scam" cable providers have used to keep advertised prices lower than they inevitably are. Comcast and other Big Cable companies rallied lobbyists to block the new rules that would hold them responsible for clarifying billing charges in their marketing efforts. However, the FCC still voted to approve the new regulations.

Permalink to story:

 
This is what you get for being a "loyal customer" to a corporation.

I abandoned Tmo YEARS ago after they locked down my note 4 and told me to go through a third party website, pay them $39, and see if theyd send me an unlock code.

Never looked back.
 
I have a top-up card, if I pay monthly E20 here in Ireland I have unlimited fast internet and unlimited calls in the network. Which I never use as everyone I want to call to is on some internet communicators like a whatsapp.
I wont ever go to any contract crap as it is simply not worth it - for me. But even with contract the price is not much different, just not as convenient.
 
Why do some people complain of 2-5 bucks hike !? This doesnt deserve any attention . Here , the carriers just multiplied the monthly fee by the annual inflation index from the past year . It s fair enough .
 
Why do some people complain of 2-5 bucks hike !? This doesnt deserve any attention . Here , the carriers just multiplied the monthly fee by the annual inflation index from the past year . It s fair enough .
Because the inflation index only goes up with sales, not wages. I also don't know how these inflation numbers are calculated because I'm generating nearly 3 times as many "reward points" on my credit card as I was almost 2 years ago and the 8% raise I got in jan 2022 feels like it never happened.

People are tired of price hikes when they have already been bled dry
 
Why do some people complain of 2-5 bucks hike !? This doesnt deserve any attention . Here , the carriers just multiplied the monthly fee by the annual inflation index from the past year . It s fair enough .

Its not the amount of the increase, its the fact that it is happening at all. T-Mobile in the past prominently advertised that "T-Mobile will never change the price you pay for your T-Mobile One plan" when promoting these plans, but now is trying to weasel their way out of those past claims. Companies should not offer service agreements that they are unable to maintain.
 
$5 here $3 over there Netflix this Amazon that, heating bill this gas that, food price this and that. It adds up.
Why do some people complain of 2-5 bucks hike !? This doesnt deserve any attention . Here , the carriers just multiplied the monthly fee by the annual inflation index from the past year . It s fair enough .

$5 here $10 over there Netflix this Amazon that, heating bill this gas that, food price this and that. It adds up.
 
Don't you know some "ambulance" chasing law firm is looking into the idea of another class action lawsuit.
If, and I say if, it goes into effect, look for Tmo customers to get probably 50 bucks or less, but the law fim
will rake in MILLIONS.
 
Toooooot , COVID should be called an American virus because USA set up a research work on coronaviruses in a lab in Wuhan . Perhaps they unintentionally let it out .
 
Why do some people complain of 2-5 bucks hike !? This doesnt deserve any attention . Here , the carriers just multiplied the monthly fee by the annual inflation index from the past year . It s fair enough .
Yes, the combination of not advertising a never-changing fee, and adjusting for inflation, is perfectly reasonable. I wouldn't complain about that.

However, the combination of prominently advertising, in unambiguous headline type, that your agreement is for a permanent price that will not change, and then changing it anyway, is not reasonable. If they wanted to advertise "permanent price indexed for inflation" they could have done so. But that's not what they said.

Also not reasonable is saying one thing in the headline and something different in the fine details.
 
Keep in mind T-Mobile is testing the waters in these rate increases no matter how small it may seem. Over time they will increase it further down the road just like your property taxes every few years because no one is speaking up. Going out of the way and promising your rates won’t go up through official announcements and then bait and switch and do the exact opposite is breach of contract. After the Sprint merger things went downhill from here with the lack of competition.
 
Back