Volvo EX30 crossovers recalled due to display glitch that hides speedometer

zohaibahd

Posts: 152   +1
Staff
The big picture: As vehicles become rolling computers loaded with code, the potential for bugs and flaws multiplies. For automakers accustomed to mechanical engineering, the shift to software-defined vehicles presents an entirely new challenge. One wrong line of code can potentially ground thousands of cars, as Volvo is finding with its EX30.

Volvo has been forced to issue a recall for every single EX30 electric crossover it has produced so far – nearly 72,000 in total – due to a seemingly minor software glitch.

The issue causes the EX30's giant center display to randomly switch into a diagnostic "test mode" during startup. When this happens, vital driving information like the speedometer reading gets blocked from view and is replaced by an obscure diagnostic screen.

You might be thinking, "big deal, just look at the gauge cluster instead." The problem is, the EX30 has no traditional gauge cluster or analog speedometer. All vehicle stats and readings are displayed exclusively on the massive center touchscreen.

When that screen malfunctions and displays the test mode overlay, drivers are essentially flying blind, with no information on their speed or other critical stats. This is far from ideal when piloting a nearly two-ton EV down the highway.

The flaw first came to light last month when Volvo issued a smaller recall covering 1,255 EX30s in Australia, warning that the issue "may potentially increase the risk of injury or death to vehicle occupants and other road users."

Instead of requiring owners to visit the dealership, Volvo has chosen to provide an easy over-the-air software update to address the issue. Owners simply need to download and install version 1.3.1 to resolve the glitchy screen behavior.

The Volvo EX30 launched last year, quickly becoming one of Europe's top EV sellers and racking up over 35,000 sales through May, according to Volvo. That doesn't come as a surprise considering it's one of the most affordable EVs around, starting at $34,950 in the US and 36,000 euros in Europe. In fact, research firm DataForce pegs it as Europe's third best-selling EV so far in 2024, behind only Tesla's Model Y and Model 3.

Volvo's presence in the EV market extends beyond cars alone. Last month, the automaker unveiled its first "production-ready" autonomous semi-truck, developed in collaboration with autonomous driving startup Aurora. Rated for Level 4 self-driving, the truck can operate mostly on its own, with a human driver taking over when needed.

Permalink to story:

 
It's morbidly fascinating to watch automakers make engineering decisions balancing creative new technologies and profit margins against their percieved value of a human life.
 
Hmmmm....if only there was something reliable that we could put behind the steering wheel that could indicate speed. Like a....GAUGE. Nah,

no way that would work when we have $5000 wundertablets!
If you are waiting for auto makers listen to what the customer wants, you've got a long wait.
Honda listened and removed touchscreen controls from the civic. Hyundai listened too.

It doesn't take long. 1-2 quarters of bad sales and feedback, these debt rilled enterprises will bend over to change things because they cannot sustain years or decades of poor sales.
 
The interiors of nearly all EV's are a disgrace and utterly the anathema of driving enjoyment. These are nothing but mobile living rooms with virtually everything dumbed down with pathetic ergonomics and involving way too much hands off the steering wheel to do simple things. That ugly POS Volvo doesn't even have a dash, it's as heinous as any Tesla trash.

So far Porsche and Audi are only ones with good EV interiors IMO.
 
It's morbidly fascinating to watch automakers make engineering decisions balancing creative new technologies and profit margins against their percieved value of a human life.
Were you an engineer -- or any other field involving even a hint of basic economics -- you'd know the crucial importance of cost analysis -- not just for cars, but homes, bridges, medical treatments, food safety, even things like bathtubs and cosmetics. We could design all these to be 100% safe in all cases and situations -- but resources are finite. We could design cars that could survive 100 mph head-on collisions and homes that could survive Cat 5 tornados -- but they'd do no good as no one could afford to buy them.

As for this particular situation, it was a simple error, quickly corrected. No need to hyperventilate.
 
Back