Hertz gets caught charging multiple Tesla renters for not returning the EVs with a full tank of gas

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,222   +1,440
Staff member
WTF?! Earlier this month, Hertz charged a customer almost $300 for not returning his rental car with a full tank. It's a standard practice with vehicle rentals and moving truck companies. However, in this case, the car was a Tesla.

Even though it is obvious that Teslas do not use gasoline, the customer had difficulty convincing Hertz customer service reps to reverse the charge. the company finally apologized for the incident and refunded the customer, blaming a systems error." However, this happened only after auto enthusiast magazine The Drive reported on the fiasco. The spokesperson said the company fixed the glitch.

Most would have written it off as a one-time anomaly, except that since publishing the story, The Drive received several other complaints of similar billing problems.

One customer received a $341 "Skip-the-Pump" fee for the Model 3 he rented. While he admits he returned the car with a low battery, Hertz should have charged him $25-$35 for a recharge. He tried getting the fee reversed, but like the other renter, customer service wouldn't work with him until he started posting his troubles publicly.

In another incident, a customer receieved a ridiculous $690.32 bill on top of his $329.83 Tesla Model 3 one-week rental. The nearly $700 in extra billing broke down to several outrageous fees – $475.19 for gas the car doesn't use, a legit $25 EV charging fee, and a crazy expensive $125.01 "rebill" for using the Supercharger network during the rental. For a frame of reference, using a Supercharger to charge a Tesla to 75 percent generally costs about $15.

It was like pulling teeth, but the renter finally got Hertz to refund the incredibly stupid $475 fuel charge, but the 10x Supercharger fee stood. These stories cause one to wonder how many other customers got the shaft and how many gave up trying to get their money back when dealing with Hertz's stubborn CS reps.

It also raises the question of was it even "the system's fault?" Considering Hertz's recent troubles with EVs, could it be trying to scrape back its losses at the customer's expense? It is one of the companies that went all in on EV rentals and discovered that people don't want to rent electric cars. Hertz CEO Stephen Scherr lost his job over the bad gamble, and the company is liquidating its EV fleet as resell values take a nose dive.

Permalink to story:

 
They're just trying to make up on the loss they took from the 100K Tesla cars they purchased.

I'm sure they had to pay for semi trucks to use fuel to drive those Tesla cars to all their lots. So, in a twisted way it only makes sense they start charging folks that rent Tesla cars a "Skip the Pump" fee.
 
Some mistakes will get overlooked. But expecting a Tesla driver to miss an opportunity to point out they don't need gas is like expecting a Harvard grad to not bring up their degree.
 
He tried getting the fee reversed, but like the other renter, customer service wouldn't work with him until he started posting his troubles publicly.
Yet the one chat session posted shows the customer pointing out the fee should be $25, and the CS Rep then instantly reversing the charge.

Gosh, ya think people might lie on the Interwebs?
 
This and any other similar theft on account of the companies needs to be dealt with VERY harshly with fines not less than 100x the false charges. Rental Car companies have been steeling from customers for far too long ....
 
This is a perfect example of why Hertz is failing with EVs and why just purchasing a fleet of Teslas is not the same as going all in. Not dealing with fill ups is the best thing about driving an EV and yet Hertz somehow has made it more expensive and stressful.

If they really wanted to go all in. They would make the comparatively small investment of installing charging stations at their locations and charge a flat rental fee.
 
At Cali prices, that 66 gallons. So, maybe Hertz thought the tesla was an RV?
In the text the customer received, they charge $9.99 to $12.99 per gallon. That would mean 36.5 to 47.6 gallons. That would also be assuming empty to full. It's odd that they would charge to full tho. Usually they have you fill up to half before returning it, which could double the amount of gas they thought was in the vehicle.
 
Some mistakes will get overlooked. But expecting a Tesla driver to miss an opportunity to point out they don't need gas is like expecting a Harvard grad to not bring up their degree.

I don't know of anybody who would simply "overlook" a massive upcharge.
 
Even if they fix the fuel charge (which is ridiculous, obviously there's no gas tank in there at all. But even if it was a gas vehicle, that charge is for over 30 gallons of fuel; no car has a tank that big. Even a Suburban has a 28 gallon tank).

Well, even if they fix that, taking advantage of the car charging via a Tesla account owned by the rental car company to mark up the charging by 10x makes sure there's no reason to rent and drive one of these things. I mean, you're having to stop and wait around on your vacation for this thing to charge, instead of spending about a minute dumping fuel into it. I just ran the numbers... average cost at Supercharger is $0.25/kwh, 33.7 kwh is equivlanet to a gallon of gas, these are rated at 131 mpge. That comes out to 6.4 cents a mile. A 40MPG car at $3.10 comes out to 7.5 cents a mile -- the Tesla is costing about the same as a car getting 48MPG. So multiply the cost by 10, you could be driving a vehicle getting *5MPG* and still beat the costs of driving the Tesla due to these ridiculous markups!
 
Hertz is the worst rental company. Just look at their fees (regardless of the erroneous charge). Everything is magnitudes higher than their cost. Over $600 because you didn't refuel? My last experience with Hertz will be my final after taking over 3 hours standing in lines to get my RESERVED car. They truly don't care about the customer.
 
Perhaps companies renting EVs should have dedicated charge points in their parking zone. If you return a vehicle at 80% or over then there's no charge. If you plug it in to the charger then you get charged the standard charge rate. If the rental company have to plug it in then charge say double the rate.

I don't often hire cars these days but, if given a choice, I'd love to hire a Tesla just to try one out.
 
Hertz is the worst rental company. Just look at their fees (regardless of the erroneous charge). Everything is magnitudes higher than their cost. Over $600 because you didn't refuel? My last experience with Hertz will be my final after taking over 3 hours standing in lines to get my RESERVED car. They truly don't care about the customer.
Serious question: What are the better rental companies as of May 2024? Presumably they all suck to some degree but there has to be a top choice when we have to rent cars.
 
Back